<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>PicJur</title>
	<link>http://picjur.com</link>
	<description>Law school is a journey. Take a map.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>The Contracts Poster Set</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Use our unique flow chart system to make Contracts  easier to understand, and easier to remember. This set of two full-color 27&#8243; x 39&#8243; posters shows you both the big picture and the black letter details of contract law. Learning Contracts visually  saves you time and increases your understanding making the followings things readily apparent: [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2011/01/the-contracts-poster-set/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hello World!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the official PicJur Blog.]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2011/01/hello-world-3/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Erie Doctrine</title>
		<description><![CDATA[When a federal court is exercising diversity jurisdiction, it must apply the substantive law of the state in which it sits. Erie Railroad v. Thomkins, clarifying the Rules of Decision Act (28 U.S.C. §1652). A state statute setting forth a cause of action is a clear example of state substantive law. Less obvious examples of substantive law [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/12/the-erie-doctrine/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure Update: Card 9</title>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/civil-procedure-update-card-9/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure Update: Card 23</title>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/civil-procedure-update-card-23/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Visual Search Results from Fastcase</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, a legal database that provides visual search results. We&#8217;re awed by the way that Fastcase makes the importance and relevance of cases immediately obvious. Not only that, they actually charge a reasonable, all-you-can-eat fee for access, from $65-$95 a month. They also offer a free trial, and significantly reduced rates for students. Check them [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/visual-search-results-from-fastcase/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Remedies for Breach of Contract</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A. Compensatory Damages The Plaintiff (non-breaching party) is put in the position he/she/it would be in if promise had been performed. 1.  Expectation Damages Expectation damages are designed to give the Plaintiff (non-breaching party) the &#8220;benefit of the bargain.&#8221; This means compensating the Plaintiff so that he is placed in the position he would have [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/remedies-for-breach-of-contract/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Judgment as a Matter of Law</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A. Judgment as a Matter of Law: Rule 50(a) The motion formerly known as &#8220;motion for a directed verdict.&#8221; Some state courts still call it that. 1. The moving party must specify: a. the judgment sought, and b. the facts and law on which it is entitled to the judgment. 2. Standard: there must be no [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/judgment-as-a-matter-of-law/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Federal Class Actions</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A. Prerequisites: Rule 23(a). All four requirements must be met. 1. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. 2. There are questions of law or fact common to the class. 3. The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class. 4. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/federal-class-actions/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Products Liability Part 1: Overview</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Most courts hold manufacturers and suppliers of defective products strictly liable for injuries caused by the defect. Note that anyone in the chain of distribution may be held liable, as long as they are commercial suppliers of the product. Those who occasionally sell products (i.e., selling a used car) will not be held strictly liable. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://picjur.com/2010/11/products-liability-part-1/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

